Saturday, September 27, 2025

Is this a dystopia or a utopia?

It's time the USA got modern and transitioned the three branches of Government to the Digital Gig Economy. 

Legislators would be selected as needed for specific bills, enacted by departments calling in workers on demand, and adjudicated by a dynamic pool of potential clerks and judges.
The lean 'n' clean just-in-time government would strictly adhere to agile standards, working in two week sprints, with all progress posted publicly online Agile Board. All proposed actions: legislation, enforcement, procurement, etc, would be specified as unit tests and would have to pass these tests in order to be put into action. Furthermore, all laws would be subject to strict code coverage - no legal stipulation will be untested.
Tasks will be broken down into simple goals, which include testing and training, so that people can be drafted like jury service to serve as judges, legislators, and ambassadors.
Voting will be unnecessary, since the constant turnover of randomly drafted citizens will ensure that actions get the representation they need, and the aforementioned turnover will eliminate career politics and corruption.
Roles in the Agile Government will determined and vetted by machine learning, which having observed the processes involved, will continuously propose new legislation to optimize those processes. Newly conceived offices and positions will replace the traditional hierarchies so prone to inaction and corruption.
The crude concept of "working for a living" is then replaced with guaranteed environmental predictability, food, housing, education, health care, travel, digital infrastructure, distribution of goods, and dissolution of political borders. This will bring back the pre-cash economy, while the remnants of the old economics may still play out as a kind of sport.

-- Sept 27, 2020

Wednesday, July 23, 2025

Climate Reporting 

I'm troubled by the horse-racey reporting on the continuous record breaking of previous temperature and precipitation maxima.

The story is not that limit has been exceeded, it's that the limit _can be_ exceeded, and is likely to be surpassed in the near future.
Reporting like this leverages a comforting idea that these record breaks are rare, so you can be relieved when they are "over."
The new story is to be actively working to stop the causes, sustainably adapt to these changes, and shelter those fleeing these changes. Related to this is that while certain populations are much more at risk for disaster than others, the climates extra energy and water can show up in "less vulnerable" places as well. In short, you are not off the list.
The weirdness of secondary effects: fire tornados, heat domes that just stay put and stay hot, overheated bathtub surface water temperatures, ice NOT growing in Antarctic seas really makes you tear up your Bingo card.

Tuesday, April 08, 2025

Keeping Score.


 Declaration of Independence Grievances – Checklist


Government and Legislative Issues


☒ Prevented laws necessary for the public good from being passed.

☒ Refused to approve laws unless the people gave up their right to representation.

Called legislative meetings in inconvenient locations to make governance difficult.

Dissolved representative houses for opposing his policies.

Refused to allow new representatives to be elected after dissolving legislative bodies.


Judicial and Legal System


☒ Refused to establish fair judiciary powers.

☒ Made judges dependent on his will for their office and salary.


Military and Enforcement Issues


☒ Created many new offices and sent officers to harass the people.

Kept standing armies in the colonies without consent.

Made the military superior to civil authority.

Quartered troops among civilians without consent.

Protected soldiers from punishment for crimes committed against colonists.


Trade and Economy


☒ Cut off colonial trade with the rest of the world.

☒ Imposed taxes without colonial consent.


Legal Rights and Due Process


☒ Denied colonists trial by jury.

☒ Transported colonists overseas for trial on false accusations.


Government Overreach and Tyranny


☒ Abolished colonial laws and fundamentally altered governments.

Suspended legislatures and declared himself the sole ruler.

Waged war against the colonies, burning towns and destroying lives.

Hired foreign mercenaries to attack the colonies.

Forced colonists into the British navy or army against their will.


Response to Colonial Petitions


☒ Ignored peaceful petitions for redress of grievances.

☒ Repeatedly acted as a tyrant rather than a fair ruler.


Tuesday, November 26, 2024

Is Creativity Dead - in Antarctica?

Comment to "Is creativity dead?" 

to nyt article:  "https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/26/opinion/social-media-algorithm-creativity.html"  

Look, !'m 201 years old and spent a lot of time growing up in Antarctica. If you want to see sameness, you can't beat 19th century Antarctica. 

 Listen to me, because I can barely remember it.

A six month night means you get to know the stars really well. The aurora australis bathed us in beauty while katabatic winds basically freeze dried everything. Even more than the Arctic, reality is stripped to essentials in a barren, continent sized desert. We were isolated from the cultural and political turmoil that took place in the 19th century. Narratives and structures like "religions" and "politics" were unimaginable in the dry frozen dark. We developed language that mimiced the sounds of the fulmars, whales, penguins, and seals that we were barely distinguished from. That meant a lot of our communication was singing.  We were humbled to be part of the animal kingdom. 

In my 40s, our world ended when some sailors blew in from Ushaia and kidnapped us. We had no idea of the world beyond the  Southern Ocean. I can't believe how often the sun rises and sets! We had never seen clothes that were not made of skins, land plants, and especially, wood.  Wood is a miracle. 

You youngsters are so easily distracted. You'll find it different after flood, fires and droughts reshape your culture to something closer to how I used to live. 

Thursday, November 14, 2024

Comment on NYT: "A Big Climate Goal Is Getting Further Out Of Reach"

We're pretty obviously galloping madly in the "More Carbon" direction. The feedback loop of more heat means:

 - more release of methane from permafrost

 - less efficient uptake of CO2 from forests

 - Wildfires put their own carbon load in the atmosphere, which lasts after the cooling effect of the ash has precipitated. 

 - Extinction events for the biosphere due to moving growth zones and the reduction or cessation of the AMOC mean those creatures who survive will have a harder time of it.

- Positive feedback loops work faster and more reliably than economic growth.

There are a few straightforward solutions that are totally politically impossible. Stop drilling and processing now. Stop military action, which is a wanton carbon emitter at all stages of production and deployment. Plow those resources into sustainable tech, relocation off the coasts, housing for the upcoming waves of climate refugees. Whatever it costs - and money is largely fictional - it will be a tiny fraction of the cost of continuing. 

Regarding:

[https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/14/climate/climate-action-tracker-temperatures-emissions.html?smid=url-share]

Monday, August 12, 2024

Comment on NYT article "How Close Are the Planet’s Climate Tipping Points?"



Climate is a court that judges us every day, and issues sentences. In the past, that court would process its work at a slow-ish pace over centuries. These tipping points - and there are surely more that will become apparent once the mechanisms of the climate are put more out of balance - mean that the judgements will come to pass faster.


The imbalance will put us in situations that have never happened in human history : hurricanes that swing around the central Atlantic and don't peter out right away. Stretches of hot weather that destroy human infrastructure and of course the natural world. And the inability of the one natural mechanism for CO2 remediation, photosynthesis, to stop working at a scale that it needs to.


Greenland doesn't have to melt completely. The Himalayan glaciers don't have to completely disappear for irreparable harm to happen to otherwise dependable foundations of society: the right to clean air, potable water, stable land, sustainable food. Carbon pollution is subsidized, its harm externalized.


Monday, April 22, 2024

Comment on NYT "Climate Doom Is Out. ‘Apocalyptic Optimism’ Is In."

In re: climactic optimism:  as seen in the  NYTimes:

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/21/arts/television/climate-change-apocalypse-optimism.html


Take a look a the book "I Want a Better Catastrophe" by Andrew Boyd. If you think we are not going to surpass +1.5°C , well, the sine qua non of that, i.e. ACTUALLY surpassing +1.5°C in the last 12 months, each of which has been the hottest of that particular month ever, has already happened. 

Also: the oceans are radically warmer. Really, every climate metric you examine is going the wrong way. 

The solutions are stunningly simple, of course. Shut down all oil production now, and stop all petroleum powered vehicles when their tanks empty. Stop war - the destruction and prep for it, and logistics for it are a major source of atmospheric carbon. Getting rid of petroleum traffic will go a long way toward dropping consumption, and the waste of all sorts that that produces. Stop eating meat. You don't need to eat meat. Get food that doesn't need refrigeration or air travel. 

There's really no tech fix that can replace these wasteful, carboniferous practices in a timeline fast enough to avoid the even worse consequences than the economic downfall these actions will produce.


Monday, March 04, 2024

The 14th Amendment

 As they say, I am not a Supreme Court Justice, but states in fact do not elect presidents in a presidential election. They elect state-based electors, which cast their votes for president. There are no federal administrators of elections: these powers are indeed reserved to the states. 

The 14th Amendment is not about the election process, it's about who can hold office. For example, it's pretty clear that legislators violating their oaths on Jan 6th forfeited their right to serve in Congress or any other federal office. They need not be indicted or tried for insurrection, their participation is as straightforward a disqualification as the age and nativity qualifications. A number of them should be booted right now.

That said, nothing about the 14th Amendment constrains who can be on the ballot; it merely disqualifies any insurrectionist from being seated, absurd as that sounds. You can vote for anyone - whether they are qualified or not.  The timeline is irrelevant, so if there are FURTHER insurrection attempts between now and Jan 2025, those restrictions still apply to other insurrectionists running for federal offices. That's right, I'm accounting for yet another insurrection in the hot summer of '24. 

So the question remains: which authority enforces these restrictions? It probably should be whomever is administering the oath. Should Trump actually select a Vice President who was not an insurrectionist, then by the order of succession, that person would become president. If not, so on through the presidential line of succession.

Friday, November 03, 2023

Aerosols to the rescue?

[comment to ars technica https://arstechnica.com/science/2023/11/former-head-of-nasas-climate-group-issues-dire-warning-on-warming/ ]

We're now getting the kind of disaster that wipes out entire cities as a time. Just a few right now, but that's clearly going to accelerate, and not even be in places already acknowledged as vulnerable (that is, poor people and the global south). Temperatures that stay high evaporate more water, and there's going to be more water available anyway. 

We're used to storms destroying places, but having time to rebuild, sometimes even rebuild with the future in mind (e.g., not rebuilding in a flood plain), but whole new secondary effects are now getting enabled with the temperature rise: things like permafrost melting, fire tornados, and soon, large areas with wet bulb temperatures for extended periods of time that humans can't live in, any more than they can live under water. 

Oh, and it's not just humans, navel gazers, it's all the other plants and animals. 

Photosynthesis becomes less efficient at high temperatures, making the only at scale natural carbon sink less reliable. Aerosols may be increasing albedo, or lowering it, depending on the aerosol. Apparently, there's a lot of microplastic already in the air. Also: any geo-engineering without pumping up the carbon volume is kind of a pipe dream at this point.

Why anyone thinks any semblance of resilience and adaptability will be possible after around 2030 is a mystery to me. P.S.: hot wars are just about the most carboniferous activity people can participate in.

Tuesday, September 19, 2023

Geriatric candidates on the run!

 More NYT commentary, this time on the handwringing over Biden's age, which for some reason is never handwringing about Trump's already obvious mental decline.


Jhh Lowengard | Kingston, NY
In the past, former presidents and legislators stayed on the scene after leaving office, either by running for a different office or just being one of the smoky voices in the smoke filled room. You can actually see this in the non-governing power of Trump. Part of that power is that the GOP literally has no platform except what Trump says. What he seeks, on the record, is more time to grift, and possibly pardon himself and people who still are loyal to him, and to vengefully persecute his opponents.

Comparing Trump's mental acuity to Biden's is the real comparison, and in the race to get to the end of a sentence, Trump is clearly the loser.

But there's a non-zero possibility that neither of these oldsters will make it to election day 2024. This is what both parties should prepare for. The primaries are set up to emphasize differences between candidates, but the process of running should also clarify how there is continuity of political purpose between leaders and their possible successors.

There's even a possibility that climate disaster issues could finally step in to move aside issues driving politics today to issues like "how can we rebuild", "Where can we move", "How can we help others who have to relocate". Remember: 2023, the hottest year in recorded history, will likely be one of the coolest of the foreseeable future .

Thursday, September 14, 2023

Start by stopping carbon mining and consumption.

 My latest NYT comment, on using iron in the ocean as a geo engineering carbon capture solutions:


The idea here is that "We (tech fixers) alone can fix the Climate catastrophe" . Well, we can! Stop producing and using carbon emissions now, worldwide. We can do this in an orderly way, starting with stopping drilling, then stopping mining. Industries reliant on this will be shut down in a similarly orderly fashion, and paid off with money, which is a fiction, so we can make as much as necessary.

You can't geo-engineer out of an ever increasing supply of carbon, especially when the geo-engineering itself would necessarily itself be a huge source of carbon emissions. 

Shutting down fuels would be a tremendous hit to the economy and culture. But guess what? It would be cheaper than a 2+ degree C future, which is what we bought with all that fuel.

Do you have the budget to put the methane back in the permafrost and somehow regrow the glaciers and polar ice?

We're now at the state where small cities are wiped out in single weather events. When the frequency and scope of these events exceeds the means to recover from them, the time for any action will be taken up in emigration, fanciful and ineffective prepping, and faith-based solutions of dubious efficacy.

Wednesday, September 06, 2023

Forests aren't Our Friends...

[Reply to an article in the NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/06/opinion/columnists/forest-fires-climate-change.html ]

 What forests aren't are a source of permission to continue spewing carbon in the atmosphere. For one thing, the amount to capture is still increasing every year. For another thing, the climate change itself is impeding the capacity for forests to do that sequestration, due to how that process responds to heat. For another thing, we're also either intentionally removing these natural carbons sinks en masse, or sitting by as they die of thirst, are eaten by bugs that aren't killed in winter anymore, burn, releasing even more sunk carbon into the air and water. 

Here's a depressing article to fill you in on some of this:

https://knowablemagazine.org/article/food-environment/2023/dead-trees-shocking-scientists

The right way to act is to do everything possible, and the most effective is to stop with oil/gas extraction, stop with subsidizing those extractions, and get off carbon addiction. If there's less to remove, removing it will be easier. 

We can do this work in an orderly way, shutting down carbon sources while compensating those who lose out on their carbon fueled lives, and relocating them as best we can, or we can let the climate decide for us, and take out ecosystems and civilizations without any human direction. 

"But this will be more expensive than any other previous world project!"  To this I say: we and 8 generations before us have incurred that debt, and we not only have to pay the interest in terms of positive feedback loops, but the massive principle.


Monday, July 31, 2023

Decarbonizing

 You'll be surprised how well the economy will work without burning carbon. 

We can have a gentle decarbonization, first by stopping exploration and opening new sources now, before they start. Then, by shutting down pipelines and refineries one by one, randomly. Removing fossil fuel subsidies, which are artificially depressing the fuel prices.  We can do this, and it needs to be done internationally.  As this happens, we can cut down consumption, find alternatives, not fast enough at first, but faster as the technologies mature. 


Or, we can let the true ruler of the earth, the climate, do it for us, more cruelly, more suddenly, more capriciously. Vulnerable populations will be hurt more at first, forcing migrations to the unwilling not-yet affected areas, but it's only a matter of time - a short time - before smugly secure places are also affected and also made uninhabitable. The lifeboats in this chaotic sea will be the communities that are sustainable - that pay their debt to the earth. But it will not have the flexibility of response that a controlled shutdown would allow. 

The collapse of non-human ecosystems and geological process like ocean steams, jets streams, glaciers, which underlie all economies, no matter which system, will collapse them. You can't claim that working to stop carbon pollution is too expensive. Its expense is pitifully small compared to the collapse of everything underlying value, worldwide.

We know of no processes that can pull the carbon out of the atmosphere as rapidly as we put it in, at scale. So we have to start by not making the problem worse. 

Wednesday, July 26, 2023

Climate Trigger points

 The Collapse of AMOC is just one working ecological system that can quickly break down due to consequences of too much heat in the atmosphere and sea. We can relate to it because the Gulf Stream has been anomalously heating Northern Europe, where many of its populous cities are above the latitude of Montreal. Without the stream's movement, we can expect more effects, such as the decline in fish stocks, changes in hurricane development, sea level changes independent of the addition of melting land ice's fresh water.

Other predictable systems such as reliable monsoons, permafrost, and glaciation: changes in these can stress the natural world that needs to be predictable for us to exploit it in our current cultures. When to plant and what to plant? Will the birds and insects return to pollinate? Will the forests be there to stabilize the soil? 

A trigger point is where the process is unbalanced just enough to be a self-sustaining cascade, usually exponential in nature. A bit of the energy released contributes to the energy that is doing the releasing.  Humans, who are fairly innumerate to begin with, have a hard time understanding processes with exponential velocities. When we drop rocks off a cliff, that's 32 feet per second squared, but we're rarely high enough or in a place to observe its motion over a period of more than a few seconds. It's just not in our experience. 

The feedback loops we have here not only feed the process releasing the energy, but any other nearby process that by itself would take more energy to reach that tipping point. They are not isolated.

The amount of CO2 in the air already is a huge ecological debt. This is the debt that matters. Innumeracy is keeping decision makers from measuring the cost of shutdowns, conversions and climate refugee migration against the cost of the shutdown of natural processes that were assumed to be free throughout the development of human cultures. Cultures that value property rights - the climate does not value property rights. Cultures that rely on natural growth cycles, natural animal migrations, tide heights, snowpack growth and melting - these cycles will change. Cultures relying on the effect of polar ice on sea salinity and the jet stream - we can't change these but the climate can. 

We have to start by not increasing the debt.  For things we directly control, that means literally not burning carbon emitters to run machinery, or as a source of heat, not removing carbon sinks like forests and oceans. The trouble there is that forests are worse carbon sinks the hotter it gets, and the oceans already have absorbed much of the new CO2 and can't keep up. 

You can watch the interplay of source and sink in the measurements of Co2 from Mauna Loa (and Maunakea while Mauna Loa is erupting). When the global north, which has the most forestry, is growing, the amount of CO2 goes down. When it's more idle, the amount goes back up. But the net addition of carbon outside this cycle pushes the next peak higher than the year before. 

https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/ ]

But it does prove that there is a natural process that takes carbon out of the air. As long as those plants don't burn, that carbon can be added to the soil. Can a similar process be optimized and scaled? Can the process that does it actually be carbon neutral or negative? Unfortunately, it's a tech fix, which means it won't happen  unless someone makes money.


Monday, April 10, 2023

 Bitcoins and Energy Use 


One day, the final bitcoin will be mined, since there are a finite number of them. Will that be the end?


On that day, in that country, scorched by drought, swept clean by tornados and floods, burnt dry by wildfires, starved by the consequent soil destruction, and overrun by internal and external climate refugees,  a new crypto currency will be proposed and implemented, resistant to quantum calculations, that will burn up the remaining fossil fuel. 

Monday, March 20, 2023

 1.5°C

Here's a quick reminder of what an average global temperature is. An average temperature is the sum of all the temperatures divided by the number of readings. That means some temperatures are lower, some are higher. At the current 1.1°C, 1.5°C  has already been reached, not constantly yet, not everywhere yet.


1.5°C and 2°C or other numbers are not magic numbers, they are checkpoints of climate models. Reaching any average temperature implies that some places are far above that level, so there are places in the world already where we can see what the effects of more heat are. These places are more or less at the poles, the North Pole the most,  and working their way down the latitudes. 


The poles are effectively linked to other climate zones in our ecosystem. We are already experiencing the effect of more energy in the air and water through the higher absorption of water vapor, itself a greenhouse gas, which adds mass to air masses, and adds chaos to the flow of circumpolar jet streams. 


It doesn't have to be a disaster everywhere for unrecoverable catastrophic weather events to happen right now in some places. The usual story we associate with a disaster is: despite some planning and preparation, a disaster occurs, destroying human and animal lives, infrastructure, and in some cases, the shape of land, seas or rivers. As these are rare events, there's period of recovery where the knowledge that that kind of disaster is possible informs the rebuilding efforts. In our new situation, we won't have time to rebuild and the assumptions for designing civil engineering are now unclear.


 This week (March 20, 2023), there will be a 40-50°F shift in temperature in North Carolina, from 29 to 80+ degrees. This stresses animal and plant life, but  also stresses steel and concrete. Cracks in roads and buildings lets in water and plant roots, two powerful corrosive and destructive  forces. This destruction is not proceeding at the pace of centuries.


Ecological system components influence each other. More water squeezed out of the air means more water on land, more fresh water in the ocean. The higher mass of water in the air means the air moves more slowly and powerfully, and the contrast between the weight of dry and wet air means more powerful winds. The parched earth has less capacity to absorb that water, creating new arroyos in what used to be stable formations.



Thursday, March 16, 2023

Poverty

Poverty

It is expensive to be poor. Cash flow can look adequate if averaged over time, but when it bottoms out and the bank starts charging overdraft fees, and hours are spent trying to negotiate for services that should be human rights, you end up each day - each hour - in worse shape than before. 


As long as we demand that essential services necessary for human rights - shelter, food, heath care, education - be paid for with money, then for social justice, there must be a universal basic income. There must not be means testing. Rich people also deserve a basic income, and their hubris as to perceived needs  versus what their actual needs are, should be revealed and healed through catharsis (that is radical taxation). 


We are about to enter an era where the foundation of wealth, great and poor, is going to be removed through frequent unrecoverable climate emergencies. The bottom is going to drop out of the only economy that matters: the water cycle. As different populations find themselves in unlivable territories, there'll be a new kind of poverty, borne by climate refugees whose land equity has been cancelled. Among these will be many who thought they were living in a sustainable, or growing, security, that they alone were responsible for their wealth. 


The true landlords are the Earth, the seas, lakes, and rivers, the air, and the biosphere that maintains it and enriches it. That's the rent that has to be paid, in the currency of sustainability. 

Thursday, January 12, 2023

Happy Bicentennial to Me!


I don't like to talk about it much, but my standard bio claims that I was born in 1823, which was some time ago. The exact date is Jan 27, 1823, so that's coming up in a few short weeks. I'm not planning on having tall ships sail around New York Harbor or set off any fireworks or sing that great tune by Henry Gibson, but I may treat myself to something appropriate for a man of my age. 

You're probably curious about what I remember from the old days. My extreme youth is pretty much lost as it is to many, and diaries my mother was keeping were lost in the Great Fire of 1845 along with much other property down in the warehouse. I was working over on Rector street and it was a constant sequence of blasts and falling debris. I was up in the country for the earlier fire in 1835, but definitely remember buildings that were burned down then too. Sic transit gloria mundi. Yes, lots of people dropped Latin phrases all the time.

All through the first half of the 19th century, even having decisively beaten British forces and established something of an economic presence in the world, the USA still had a cultural inferiority complex. It was up to us to prove we were as good as those governed with the divine endorsement of sovereignty. It was not enough that we started losing our accents. We needed music and art,  poetry and dance that were unmistakably American. This turned out to be the Hudson River School of painting.

The lower class American accent was not really significantly divergent from northern Irish at the time. People would take up idioms slowly, and imitate idiolects until nobody knew who they were imitating. This is the kind of stuff you can notice over a period of 80-110 years. Audio mass communication did a lot to stop accent development.

And really, the times changed rapidly with the steamboat and rail roads. The world moved at two speeds then: walking and riding horses, and the new miraculously faster and reliable engine driven transports. Running a rail line through undeveloped land shrank the distances between city centers, and junctions created centers where there were none before. Communities did not have to be self supporting anymore and could rely on imported food, clothing and building materials.  

There's a whole other thing, which has to do with memory. Once you pass 140 or so, if you don't have good documentation, memory is pretty unreliable, and tends to merge with things you've read. Things I think I know about Lewis Carroll, since I actually knew Alice Liddell and her sister Lorina, just seem unreliable and dream like, or picked up from his letters collections, which of course have an unreliable narrator. The past turns into a kind of pudding. 

Memories have their own timbres, and the older ones are quiet, thin or missing partials and more important, memories to modulate to and harmonize with. But some things are still very strong. There was a lot more sawdust around, sawdust and hay, and whale oil, and those smells are still very sharply recalled. 

Early audio recording technology was VERY impressive in its day, just as early photography was. The first impression of photography was that it had an unbiasedness which still shows up in the phrase "The camera never lies". Of course it lies, but it's very seductive. Phonograph and dictaphone recordings, though, always had a scrim of artifacts that you had to pass through to understand the sounds. It was like listening to someone in another room in a rainstorm - nothing your ears couldn't handle. The music and speeches of home recordings showed how speaking loudly forced a kind of rhetorical dialect, which might be dropped accidentally from time to time during the recording after recovering from a cough or sneeze. 

Things broke all the time. They were mostly hand made, though, which meant someone could fix it. We would marvel at modern materials science, though. Things were heavy. Processes needed manual and animal labor. Food was unregulated and sometimes more poisonous. Housing was drafty and sooty. 


Saturday, July 23, 2022

Climate deadlock

 It is not "the Left" or "The Right" that have the actual votes. The Climate does. It does not check your vote before burning down your hillside, flooding your city, dropping a tornado or derecho just anywhere, or evaporating your reservoirs.  

It's only coordinated international work that can drive us off of carbon burning as an energy source. Nuclear has a whole other set of problems - guarding its waste for longer than recorded human history being just one of them. 

Progress in transitioning to a sustainable energy future is not something that should be hoarded by those making progress. Solutions for carbon free energy, and getting the unbalanced amount of carbon out of the atmosphere that's there is technology that must be rapidly shared without regard for profit or traditional rivalries. We have a common crisis. 

We consider acts of war justifiable - even though every act of war is a crime. As Pres. Carter remarked: we need the moral equivalent of war to attack this problem. That means we must disregard a status of protecting business and property that stand in the way of this victory, just as it is morally and civilly  justified in a war. 

Tuesday, July 05, 2022

Guns Are Magic

 Guns are magic!

They turn men from cowards into mighty lone warriors defending their life, their family, their culture, their home and property.

They are ONLY wielded by good guys.

The targets are well established non-persons, or the gun turns them into non-persons very quickly and conveniently. That's part of the magic. Non-persons don't have families, culture, or their own property.

It's much easier to kill the second non-person after killing the first. That wasn't so hard, was it? Automatic weapons mean you don't even have to aim so well. 

Let's get back to the coward. Where does that fear come from? How is that fear concentrated and directed? Why is there a feeling of injustice when others share the same rights you do? And why is a violent solution the preferred, even cultivated, "solution" to these fears? 

Why is a solution for security involving community support and connection, and reality checking, not the first place to go, rather than, say, a militarized police force, or self appointed individual.

That's where the real transformational magic is.